You have created an OSPF neighbor configuration with ArubaOS-CX 8320 VSX and a third-party switch The OSPF peering falls. In the event togs you see the following entries.
2020-10-28:03:14 20.371489|hpe-routlng|LOG_WARN|AMM|1/5jOSPFV2|OSPFV2iOSPF 268698624 Packet received with unexpected authentication type
2020-10-28:03:14.20.371503|hpe-routing|LOG_WARN|AMM|1/5|OSPFV2|OSPFV2|Expected authentication type = 0 Which statement is true about the above events?

• A. The ArubaOS-CX switch does not expect authentication with OSPF.
• B. The ArubaOS-CX switch requires plain-text authentication with OSPF.
• C. The third-party switch should be configured with key chain authentication
• D. The third-party switch should be configured with MD5 authentication

A customer is migrating from a Cisco VSS system to an ArubaOS-CX VSX cluster in order to provide default gateway functionality, the local network administrator creates VLAN interfaces The network administrator then migrates successfully from Cisco to Aruba The next day a manager asks if the solution is redundant. The network administrator realizes that there is no redundancy on the default gateway functionality What is the preferred solution with the least amount of configuration and disturbance?

• A. Remove the IP address on every VLAN interface, and replace it with another one in the same subnet Configure VRRP with the default gateway address as virtual IP-address per VLAN.
• B. For every VLAN interface, configure an active gateway IP with the same IP address as already present in the first VSX node Configure this on both switches
• C. Remove the IP address on every VLAN interface, and replace it with another one in the same subnet Configure active gateway IP with the default gateway address on every VLAN interface on Doth switches
• D. For every VLAN Interface, configure a VRRP IP address with the same IP address as already present in the first VSX node. Configure this on both switches.

The customer has a requirement for creating security filtering for IPv4 and IPv6 traffic passing through an ArubaOS-CX 6400 switch. Which statement Is true about access-list on the selected switch model?

• A. IPv4 and IPv6 entries can be used in one ACL with separate rules
• B. Routed interfaces can have only inbound ACLs
• C. Only one inbound or outbound ACL can be bound to an interface.
• D. Separate IPv4 and IPv6 ACLs need to be created for inbound and outbound traffic

(Scenarios may contain multiple errors which may or may not impact the solution) Refer to the Exhibit.

An engineer has attempted to configure two pairs of switches m the referenced configuration it Is required to implement Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation for each pair of switches The ports of the Aruba 8325 switches used for Agg01 and Agg02 are populated as follows

The configuration includes:

There is an error message stating "mismatched group speed" What should you add to the configuration to correct the error?

• A. "allow-unsupported-transceiver
• B. "speed 10-full" under interfaces 1/1/12 and 1/1/13
• C. "speed 40-full" under interfaces 1/1/49 and 1/1/50
• D. "system Interface-group 1 speed I0g"

Match the repotted status to the Aruba 8325 issue (Each option may Be used once more than once, or not at all)