CMMC-CCA PDF Pass Leader, CMMC-CCA Latest Real Test
Valid CMMC-CCA Test Answers & CMMC-CCA Exam PDF
NEW QUESTION # 71
SecureNet is a mid-sized company that designs and manufactures access control systems for government buildings. These systems utilize Internet of Things (IoT) devices embedded within the access control panels for real-time remote monitoring. SecureNet is undergoing a CMMC Level 2 assessment to comply with new government contracting requirements. During the scope validation stage, the Certified CMMC Assessor (CCA) will review SecureNet's proposed assessment scope with the IT team. The scope includes all servers, workstations, and laptops within SecureNet's network. However, there is no mention of the IoT devices within the access control panels. Which of the following asset categories is most likely to encompass the in- scope IoT devices used in SecureNet's access control systems?
- A. Specialized Assets
- B. Security Protection Asset (SPA)
- C. Contractor Risk Managed Asset (CRMA)
- D. Hardware Assets
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
IoT devices in access control panels are Specialized Assets per the CMMC Assessment Scope - Level 2, as they are non-standard equipment tied to contract performance. They may process or transmit CUI-related data (e.g., security monitoring), making them in scope, but they don't inherently provide security functions (Option A) or fit as CRMAs (Option D). "Hardware Assets" (Option C) is not a CMMC category. B is correct, and the IoT devices should be added to the scope.
Reference:
CMMC Assessment Scope - Level 2, Section 2.3.4 (Specialized Assets), p. 6: "IoT devices are Specialized Assets."
NEW QUESTION # 72
You are the Lead Assessor for a CMMC assessment. During the Final Findings Briefing, the OSC Assessment Official disputes a "NOT MET" finding, claiming the evidence was misinterpreted. What is the OSC's recourse according to the CMMC Assessment Process?
- A. Submit an appeal using the Assessment Appeals Process outlined in the CAP.
- B. Reapply for a new assessment with a different C3PAO.
- C. Request an immediate reassessment by the same Assessment Team.
- D. Demand that the Lead Assessor revise the finding based on their explanation.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CAP provides an Appeals Process for disputes (Option B). Options A, C, and D do not follow CAP procedures.
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 3.3 - Assessment Appeals Process (pg. 34):"If the OSC disagrees with findings, they may submit an appeal using the Assessment Appeals Process." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 3.3.
NEW QUESTION # 73
An OSC previously received a Conditional CMMC Level 2 Certification during Phase 3 of the assessment process. The OSC has been working on implementing a POA&M to address the practice deficiencies identified during the initial assessment. Now, within 180 days from the Final Recommended Findings Briefing, you are to conduct a POA&M Closeout Assessment. As the Lead Assessor, you and your assessment team review the OSC's updated POA&M, accompanying evidence, and any scheduled observations, interviews, or tests with the aim of validating the implementation of the corrective actions. If the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) disagrees with the C3PAO's findings during the POA&M Closeout Assessment, what is the recourse?
- A. Submit an appeal using the Assessment Appeals Process outlined in the CAP.
- B. Request an extension of the timeline for corrective actions.
- C. Demand a reassessment by the same C3PAO and Lead Assessor.
- D. Immediately reapply for CMMC Level 2 certification with a different C3PAO.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CAP provides a formal Assessment Appeals Process for OSCs to dispute C3PAO findings, ensuring fairness and due process. Option A (reapplying with another C3PAO) bypasses resolution and incurs unnecessary costs. Option C (requesting extension) addresses timing, not disagreement with findings. Option D (demanding reassessment) lacks CAP support without an appeal. Option B is the prescribed recourse.
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 3.3 - Assessment Appeals Process (pg. 34):"If the OSC disagrees with the C3PAO's findings, they may submit an appeal using the Assessment Appeals Process outlined in this CAP." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 3.3.
NEW QUESTION # 74
An OSC processes data in its owned data center. The data center includes a very early smoke detection apparatus (VESDA). The apparatus only captures log information from its sensors around the data center. It is not intended, nor capable of, processing CUI. The VESDA is on a separate VLAN and is in a separate locked room in the data center.
Should the assessor agree that the VESDA is out-of-scope?
- A. No. Even though the VESDA controller is in a locked room and on a separate VLAN, the VESDA is an essential security function as an early warning system.
- B. Yes. The VESDA serves a non-data processing purpose and is only connected to sensors. Sensors are out-of-scope, so the VESDA is out-of-scope.
- C. No. Even though the sensors are out-of-scope, the VESDA could provide access to the outside network if sensors were misused, and CUI could be exfiltrated.
- D. Yes. The VESDA is physically and logically separated from the other data center equipment, and it is not intended nor capable of processing CUI.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The CMMC Scoping Guidance allows assets to be classified as Out-of-Scope if:
* They are physically/logically isolated, and
* They cannot process, store, or transmit CUI.
Extract:
"Out-of-Scope assets are those that cannot process, store, or transmit CUI and are physically or logically separated from CUI assets." The VESDA system only monitors environmental conditions and does not interact with CUI. Its segregation supports an out-of-scope classification.
Reference: CMMC Scoping Guidance - Out-of-Scope Assets.
NEW QUESTION # 75
An Assessment Team is reviewing the scope of a CMMC assessment for an OSC. The OSC has defined a narrow security boundary for their assessment, which the Assessment Team believes may not adequately protect all sensitive information. The OSC gives reasons for this, including financial constraints, and claims that CUI is only contained within an enclave defined by the boundary. However, after inspecting the facility and interviewing employees, you determine that some assets that may process CUI are outside the enclave.
What is the risk of the OSC defining a security boundary that is too narrow in scope for the CMMC assessment?
- A. The assessment will be less expensive for the contractor.
- B. The OSC may not have done proper due diligence to protect all sensitive information within their environment.
- C. The OSC will have more systems that need to be managed separately.
- D. The assessment will take less time to complete.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
A narrow security boundary that excludes assets processing CUI poses a significant risk to the OSC's compliance with CMMC requirements. The CMMC Assessment Scope - Level 2 emphasizes that the scope must include all assets that process, store, or transmit CUI, and failure to do so indicates a lack of due diligence in identifying and protecting sensitive information. If assets outside the enclave handle CUI, they must be included in the scope to ensure comprehensive protection, as per NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC guidelines. A too-narrow scope could leave CUI vulnerable, undermining the OSC's security posture and potentially leading to non-compliance.
Option A is a consequence, not the primary risk. Options C and D focus on cost and time, which are secondary to the security risk identified in B. The CMMC CAP reinforces that proper scoping is critical to safeguarding CUI, making B the correct answer.
Reference:
CMMC Assessment Scope - Level 2, Section 2.1 (Scoping Guidance), p. 3: "A scope that is too narrow may fail to protect all sensitive information, indicating insufficient due diligence." CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 2.2 (Scope Validation)
NEW QUESTION # 76
During a CMMC assessment, the OSC provides a policy document that is signed by a manager who left the company six months ago. The OSC insists the policy is still enforced, and staff interviews confirm its use.
How should the Lead Assessor proceed?
- A. Document the outdated signature as an evidence gap and assess the policy's implementation based on interviews and other evidence.
- B. Reject the policy due to the outdated signature and score the practice as "NOT MET."
- C. Request the OSC to obtain a new signature from current management before proceeding.
- D. Accept the policy as valid evidence since it is still enforced.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CAP requires noting deficiencies like an outdated signature as an evidence gap while assessing all evidence, including interviews (Option B). Option A ignores the gap, Option C is premature, and Option D involves consulting, which is not allowed.
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 2.2 - Conduct Assessment (pg. 25):"Document deficiencies such as outdated signatures as evidence gaps and assess based on implementation evidence." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 2.2.
NEW QUESTION # 77
When conducting a CMMC assessment, the CCA must follow the steps outlined in the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP). This document is organized into several phases, each requiring the CCA to complete specific documents. The CAP also provides templates, some of which the Assessor must use and complete during specific phases. A CCA must complete all the following documents in Phase 1 of the CAP, EXCEPT?
- A. CMMC Assessment Quality Review Checklist
- B. CMMC Pre-Assessment Form Data Template
- C. CMMC Assessment Readiness Review (CA-RR) Checklist
- D. Virtual Assessment Evidence Preparation Template
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The Quality Review Checklist is a Phase 3 document, not Phase 1, unlike Options B, C, and D (Option A).
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 1.6 - Prepare for Assessment (pg. 18):"Phase 1 requires completion of the CA-RR Checklist, Virtual Evidence Template, and Pre-Assessment Form." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 1.6.
NEW QUESTION # 78
An OSC is preparing for an assessment and wants to gather evidence that will be used by the Lead Assessor to determine the scope of the assessment. The OSC currently operates a hybrid network, with part of their infrastructure at their physical location and part of their infrastructure in a cloud environment.
What evidence should the OSC collect that would assist the Lead Assessor in determining cloud and hybrid environment constraints?
- A. Subnetworks list
- B. Cloud Service Provider's Customer Responsibility Matrix
- C. System inventory
- D. Company-owned hardware list
Answer: B
Explanation:
For hybrid and cloud environments, the Customer Responsibility Matrix is the critical artifact. It identifies which security responsibilities are handled by the CSP and which remain with the OSC, directly impacting scope.
Extract:
"The OSC must provide responsibility matrices or equivalent documentation that clearly delineates which security controls are the responsibility of the provider and which are retained by the OSC." This is necessary for the Lead Assessor to define assessment scope boundaries.
Reference: CMMC Assessment Guide - Level 2; Scoping Guidance for Cloud and Hybrid Environments.
NEW QUESTION # 79
During an assessment, it is uncovered that a CCA worked as a consultant for the OSC through their RPO.
Unfortunately, the CCA didn't disclose this when their C3PAO appointed them to participate in the assessment. Did the CCA behave professionally? If not, what issues are likely to arise?
- A. No, breach of confidentiality.
- B. Yes, the CCA behaved professionally.
- C. No, assessor bias.
- D. No, lack of objectivity.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CoPC prohibits CCAs from assessing an OSC they consulted for, due to potential bias, not objectivity (Option B) or confidentiality (Option D). Option A is incorrect as this is unprofessional. Option C (assessor bias) is the precise issue.
Extract from Official Document (CoPC):
* Paragraph 3.1 - Professionalism (pg. 6):"Under no circumstances shall credentialed individuals conduct a certified assessment if they have served as a consultant to prepare the organization, due to assessor bias." References:
CMMC Code of Professional Conduct, Paragraph 3.1.
NEW QUESTION # 80
You are a CCA evaluating an OSC's proposed CMMC assessment scope when planning and preparing a CMMC assessment. The assessment scope is defined in CMMC Assessment Scope - Level 2. Which statement best defines the assessment scope according to CMMC guidelines?
- A. It includes only the physical components of the information system.
- B. It focuses solely on the cybersecurity measures implemented within the organization.
- C. It encompasses the entire organization's IT infrastructure.
- D. It includes the boundaries within an organization's networked environment that contain all the assets that will be assessed.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
The CMMC Assessment Scope - Level 2 defines the assessment scope as the specific boundaries within an organization's networked environment that encompass all assets subject to the CMMC assessment. This includes assets that process, store, or transmit Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) or Federal Contract Information (FCI), as well as Security Protection Assets (SPAs) that safeguard these assets. The scope is not limited to cybersecurity measures alone (Option A), nor does it automatically include the entire IT infrastructure (Option C) unless all components handle CUI/FCI or provide security. Option D excludes logical and networked elements, which contradicts the guidance. Option B aligns with the official definition, emphasizing the networked environment and assessed assets.
Reference:
CMMC Assessment Scope - Level 2, Section 2.1 (Scoping Guidance), p. 3: "The CMMC Assessment Scope includes the boundaries within an organization's networked environment that contain all the assets that will be assessed."
NEW QUESTION # 81
The OSC POC has prepared evidence from an internal pre-assessment for the C3PAO in preparation for a third-party assessment. The OSC POC has identified that there are several ESPs (External Service Providers) involved in protecting the security of the infrastructure. While reviewing the pre-assessment documentation regarding ESPs, the Lead Assessor will be looking for items that are:
- A. Noted as partially implemented
- B. Marked as NOT APPLICABLE
- C. Noted as inherited
- D. Marked as requiring a waiver
Answer: C
Explanation:
When External Service Providers are used, the OSC can inherit practices from the ESP if sufficient evidence is provided (such as FedRAMP authorization or equivalent). The Lead Assessor must verify which controls are noted as inherited, as these are assessed differently from controls implemented directly by the OSC.
Exact Extracts:
* CMMC Assessment Guide: "An OSC may inherit practices from External Service Providers when those providers demonstrate equivalent compliance (e.g., FedRAMP Moderate for CUI)."
* "Assessors must review documentation that identifies which practices are inherited, partially implemented, or implemented internally."
* CMMC Scoping Guide: "Inherited controls must be clearly documented by the OSC in the SSP." Why the other options are not correct:
* B: Waivers are not part of CMMC assessments.
* C: "Not Applicable" does not apply to ESP involvement; they either provide inherited practices or not.
* D: "Partially implemented" indicates deficiencies, not proper inheritance.
References:
CMMC Assessment Guide - Level 2, Version 2.13: External Service Providers and inheritance (pp. 10-13).
CMMC Scoping Guide - Level 2: Inherited practices documentation requirements.
NEW QUESTION # 82
An assessor is examining an organization's system maintenance program. While reviewing the system maintenance policy and the OSC's maintenance records for the CUI network, the assessor notices there is no mention of printers. The assessor asks the IT manager if the company has any printers.
Why is the assessor concerned if the OSC has printers?
- A. Printers must be completely isolated from all non-CUI assets.
- B. Printers can produce hard copies of CUI data that need to be safeguarded.
- C. Printers cannot be used on a CUI network without government approval.
- D. Firmware on a network printer needs to have updates as needed.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Printers are a concern because they can produce hard copies of CUI, which must be safeguarded like digital CUI. CUI handling requirements extend to both electronic and printed media.
Extract from MP.L2-3.8.4:
"Protect the confidentiality of CUI at rest and in use, including hardcopy outputs such as printed material." Thus, the concern is that printed CUI must be protected, making printers relevant to maintenance and safeguarding practices.
Reference: CMMC Assessment Guide - Level 2, MP Domain.
NEW QUESTION # 83
The Lead Assessor has conducted an assessment for an OSC. The OSC's practices have been scored and preliminary results validated. Based on this information, what is the NEXT logical step?
- A. Deliver recommended assessment results.
- B. Consider additional evidence and record gaps.
- C. Determine CMMC Assessment scope.
- D. Create, finalize, and record recommended final findings.
Answer: D
Explanation:
* Applicable Requirement: CAP - Assessment Execution Phase.
* Why D is Correct: After scoring and validating preliminary results, the next step is to finalize and record recommended final findings for submission. This closes the assessment process and supports certification decisions.
Why Other Options Are Insufficient:
* A: Scope determination occurs in planning, not after validation.
* B: Results are delivered after finalization, not immediately after validation.
* C: Considering additional evidence occurs during data collection, before validation.
References (CCA Official Sources):
* CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0 - Reporting Phase
* CMMC Assessment Guide - Level 2 - Assessment Closure
NEW QUESTION # 84
An OSC seeking Level 2 certification wants to develop and launch a website for customers to purchase items online and submit contact forms. The OSC plans to host the web server in their own data center while also maintaining the security of their internal IT environment. Based on this information, what would be the BEST approach?
- A. Configure a firewall rule to only allow internal traffic to communicate with the server for an additional layer of security to the OSC's LAN
- B. Relocate the server to a different office location to protect the OSC's LAN
- C. Configure the server to protect against object reuse and residual information via shared system resources for an additional layer of security to the OSC's LAN
- D. Configure a DMZ for an additional layer of security to the OSC's LAN to host the publicly accessible server
Answer: D
Explanation:
Public-facing systems (such as web servers) must be separated from internal enterprise networks to limit exposure. CMMC (aligned with NIST SP 800-171 SC.L2-3.13.5 "Boundary Protection") specifies that placing public servers into a demilitarized zone (DMZ) provides a security buffer and prevents direct access from the internet into the internal LAN.
Exact extracts:
* "Publicly accessible systems should be placed on separate subnets or in DMZs."
* "Boundary protection devices should separate public servers from the enterprise network."
* "DMZs provide layered protection for internet-facing assets."
Why the other options are incorrect:
* A: Relocating the server physically does not provide network-layer security.
* C: Firewall rules allowing only internal traffic would prevent public access, defeating the purpose of a public website.
* D: Object reuse protections are unrelated to network boundary security.
References:
CMMC Assessment Guide - Level 2, SC.L2-3.13.5 "Boundary Protection."
NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, 3.13.5.
NEW QUESTION # 85
Regarding virtual data collection, which of the following actions is the highest priority?
- A. Recording the use of any virtual data collection techniques, including any risks and mitigations, and how any CUI, FCI, and/or OSC proprietary information will be managed and protected.
- B. Training OSC personnel on proper document sharing practices.
- C. Implementing encryption for all communication channels used during interviews.
- D. Scheduling virtual meetings at times convenient for geographically dispersed employees.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CAP prioritizes data security in virtual assessments, requiring documentation of techniques, risks, mitigations, and protection measures for sensitive information like CUI and FCI. Option A (training) is secondary to security documentation. Option C (scheduling) is logistical, not a security priority. Option D (encryption) is important but part of broader protection measures under Option B, which is the highest priority per CAP.
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 1.6.3 - Virtual Data Collection (pg. 21):"The highest priority is recording the use of virtual data collection techniques, including risks, mitigations, and how CUI, FCI, and OSC proprietary information will be managed and protected." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 1.6.3.
NEW QUESTION # 86
Some OSCs share real estate with other companies. To protect FCI/CUI behind unmanned entrances to buildings, floors, or other areas where FCI/CUI is created, used, stored, or transmitted, which of the following is the BEST method?
- A. Cameras to monitor and record foot traffic
- B. Turnstiles to limit access
- C. One-way gates which require proper credentials or intercom authorization to unlock and permit entry
- D. Bold signage with strong language to discourage entry
Answer: C
Explanation:
The Physical Protection (PE) practices require that unmanned access points to areas containing CUI be restricted with technical controls that only allow entry to authorized personnel. While cameras, signage, and turnstiles support security, they do not actually prevent access.
Extract from PE.L2-3.10.1:
"Limit physical access to organizational information systems, equipment, and the respective operating environments to authorized individuals." The strongest measure listed is one-way gates requiring credentials or intercom authorization, which directly enforces access control.
Reference: CMMC Assessment Guide - Level 2, PE.L2-3.10.1.
NEW QUESTION # 87
During a CMMC assessment of an OSC, you discover that they rely heavily on a reputable CSP for their email services. As you delve deeper into the assessment, you suspect the OSC is incorrectly assuming that the CSP's security measures are sufficient to meet all the CMMC requirements related to email security. Given the critical nature of email communications and the potential exposure of sensitive information, you recognize the importance of clearly understanding the division of responsibilities between the OSC and the CSP for email security controls. To effectively assess how email security responsibilities are divided between the OSC and the CSP, which document should you prioritize reviewing?
- A. The Service Level Agreement (SLA) between the OSC and the CSP
- B. The OSC's overall security policy
- C. The Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) between the OSC and the CSP
- D. The CSP's publicly available security documentation
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM), per CMMC and FedRAMP guidance, delineates security control responsibilities between the OSC and CSP, critical for assessing email security (e.g., AC.L2-3.1.13). Option A (security policy) lacks CSP-specific detail. Option C (public documentation) is generic, not contractual.
Option D (SLA) focuses on service levels, not control specifics. Option B is the correct answer, providing the clearest division per CAP.
Reference Extract:
* CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 4.3:"The SRM clarifies CSP and OSC responsibilities for cloud services."Resources:https://cyberab.org/Portals/0/Documents/Process-Documents/CMMC- Assessment-Process-CAP-v1.0.pdf
NEW QUESTION # 88
During a CMMC assessment, as the Lead Assessor, you realize that the OSC relies on a Managed Service Provider (MSP) to oversee some of their IT infrastructure, including a cloud-based storage solution.
Employees access the cloud storage remotely through a web browser. The OSC has a Service Level Agreement (SLA) with the MSP outlining security protocols. However, you have limited access to the internal configuration and security controls of the MSP's cloud environment. What challenges might you encounter when assessing the OSC's compliance with CMMC's external connection controls?
- A. The use of a web browser for remote access eliminates the need to evaluate external connection security
- B. Verifying the effectiveness of the OSC's employee training programs may be difficult
- C. Limited visibility of the MSP's cloud environment could hinder assessment of how the OSC manages secure external connections to their cloud storage (AC.L1-3.1.20). The SLA might not provide sufficient detail about the specific controls implemented
- D. CMMC focuses only on the security of the OSC's on-premises network, not that of external cloud services
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
AC.L1-3.1.20 requires secure external connections, per NIST SP 800-171. Limited visibility into the MSP's cloud controls (Option B) hinders verifying compliance, as the SLA may lack specific control details, per CAP. Option A is false-web access requires evaluation. Option C misstates CMMC's scope, which includes cloud services. Option D (training) is unrelated. Option B is thecorrect answer.
Reference Extract:
* CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 4.3:"Limited MSP visibility challenges external connection assessments."Resources:https://cyberab.org/Portals/0/Documents/Process-Documents
/CMMC-Assessment-Process-CAP-v1.0.pdf
NEW QUESTION # 89
An assessor reviews the OSC's data protection policy, which requires full disk encryption on company laptops. While interviewing employees, the assessor learns that employees sometimes access data while teleworking on laptops that do not have full disk encryption.
How should the assessor view the implementation of the OSC's policy?
- A. Insufficient because there are teleworking instances where the policy is not followed.
- B. Acceptable because it requires full disk encryption of company laptops.
- C. Acceptable as long as an equivalent technical safeguard is implemented for all teleworking scenarios.
- D. Insufficient because full disk encryption is not required for laptops to comply with CMMC requirements.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The Assessment Guide emphasizes that a policy is insufficient unless it is implemented consistently across all applicable assets. Evidence from interviews showing exceptions means the practice is NOT MET.
Extract:
"Policies must not only exist but must also be enforced and implemented consistently. Exceptions indicate non-compliance." Thus, the correct answer is B.
Reference: CMMC Assessment Guide - Level 2; Assessment Methodology.
NEW QUESTION # 90
During a CMMC Level 2 assessment, the Assessment Team discovers that the OSC has implemented a practice using a tool that is not listed in their System Security Plan (SSP). The tool appears to meet the assessment objectives for the practice, but its absence from the SSP raises concerns about documentation accuracy. How should the Lead Assessor proceed?
- A. Accept the tool's use as evidence of compliance and proceed without further action, as it meets the objectives.
- B. Request the OSC to update the SSP to include the tool and provide the revised document before continuing the assessment.
- C. Document the discrepancy as an evidence gap and assess the practice based on the tool's effectiveness, continuing the assessment.
- D. Mark the practice as "NOT MET" due to the inaccurate SSP, regardless of the tool'seffectiveness.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CAP instructs documenting discrepancies as evidence gaps and assessing based on available evidence (Option C). Option A ignores documentation issues, Option B delays unnecessarily, and Option D is premature without full assessment.
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 2.2 - Conduct Assessment (pg. 25):"Incomplete or inaccurate documents should be recorded as evidence gaps, with the practice assessed based on available evidence." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 2.2.
NEW QUESTION # 91
During the planning and preparation discussions, a key member of the C3PAO Assessment Team falls ill and is unavailable for the originally scheduled assessment dates. The OSC is eager to proceed as planned and has expressed willingness to accommodate a smaller assessment team. Can the Lead Assessor proceed with the assessment using a reduced assessment team size?
- A. No, the assessment must be postponed until the full team is available.
- B. Yes, but only with the express written consent of the Cyber AB.
- C. Yes, as long as the remaining team members possess the necessary qualifications to cover all CMMC practices.
- D. The decision is solely up to the OSC.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CAP allows flexibility in team size if the remaining members are qualified to cover all practices (Option A). Options B, C, and D impose unnecessary restrictions not supported by CAP.
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 1.5 - Assessment Team Roles (pg. 16):"The Lead Assessor may proceed with a reduced team if remaining members are qualified to cover all required CMMC practices." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 1.5.
NEW QUESTION # 92
An OSC seeking Level 2 certification has recently configured system auditing capabilities for all systems within the assessment scope. The audit logs are generated based on the required events and contain the correct content that the organization has defined.
Which of the following BEST describes the next system auditing objective that the organization should define?
- A. Retention requirements for audit records
- B. Centralized audit log collection
- C. Review and update of logged events
- D. Integration of all system audit logs
Answer: C
Explanation:
The next step after configuring audit logs and ensuring event content is correct is to periodically review and update the logged events to maintain alignment with evolving security requirements and risks.
Extract from AU.L2-3.3.2 & AU.L2-3.3.7:
"Organizations must review and update audit log events periodically to ensure they continue to support accountability and monitoring objectives." While centralized collection and retention are important, the next required objective per progression is review and update of logged events.
Reference: CMMC Assessment Guide - Level 2, AU Domain.
NEW QUESTION # 93
......
CMMC-CCA Dumps Ensure Your Passing: https://www.exam4pdf.com/CMMC-CCA-dumps-torrent.html
CMMC-CCA exam dumps and online Test Engine: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ui1JFYtsQXcFscqNMJsu_IijIIxw_zjt
